Sunday, September 27, 2009

the crisis of femininity (and masculinity)

A few years ago I had the opportunity to hear Joe Ehrmann speak at a conference. Ehrmann was an All-American football player at Syracuse University, and played in the NFL for 13 years, primarily with the Baltimore Colts. He was selected to play in the 1978 Pro Bowl. Ehrmann now resides in Baltimore and, working with his wife Paula, has founded organizations such as The Door and Building Men and Women for Others which serve needs in the community.

In 1978, Ehrmann's brother Billy died of cancer. Ehrmann shared with us that up until this point, he (Joe) had been comfortable in his understanding of who he was. But as he tried to care for Billy, he found himself completely unprepared - unable to comfort him, and ill-equipped to find words of love or hope. He began to question his assumptions and priorities about his life, and began to wonder what use his experiences had been, if they had not helped him at this most important of moments.

This brings me to the primary subject(s) of this post.

Ehrmann began to theorize that in our society, we are in both a crisis of masculinity and a crisis of femininity. Examining his own experiences, the experiences of others, and social & media expectations, he came up with a list of the "three lies" which are projected about each gender.

Lies About What it Means to Be a Man:
  1. Masculinity is defined by your size, strength, and athletic ability.
  2. Masculinity is defined by sexual conquest of women.
  3. Masculinity is defined by economic success.
Ehrmann explained that, while trying to comfort his brother, he had been in possession of these supposed definitions of masculinity - and yet had never felt less "manly" or fulfilled or actualized. All of these supposedly essential achievements became meaningless when he was confronted by a true challenge. What use, then, are these characteristics in the grand schemes of our lives? And yet, when we examine the males held up in movies, sports, and pop culture, many of them are largely defined by these three lies; and many boys grow up fearful that not meeting these "requirements" will result in ostracization.

Lies About What it Means to Be a Woman:
  1. Femininity is defined by your beauty and body type.
  2. To be feminine, you must be deferring, polite, silent, and not smart. You must manipulate to have your needs met, as though you cannot ask.
  3. Femininity means that you need a man to complete you.
When I (caro) examine the females most often held up in pop culture, they fit these detrimental characteristics. Girls in early elementary school often unfortunately feel the pressures of appearance and beauty, as well as the pressures to be concerned about boyfriends, etc. Female characters, arguably, who might be described as outspoken, intelligent, independent, or "not a traditional beauty" are probably relegated to the sidelines, to be the friend of the main character, the class brain, or the one that bosses everyone around. Even worse, they are the girl who gets a makeover, and turns out to be beautiful after all - it turns out that all the wonderful qualities she had before are much less meaningful than the necessity for a female to be beautiful.

Thankfully, there are many wonderful, inspirational exceptions to these "lie-based" norms out there in our world. But I worry that the problem is much deeper, and more firmly embedded in our culture than we might think.

Your thoughts? I encourage any comments or reactions, as these are subjects I am looking forward to discussing.

5 comments:

  1. Caro, I agree with what you said about how girls as early as elementary school gain an unhealthy (hyper)consciousness of their bodies and attempt to embody the stereotypical form of femininity fed to them by the media/culture.
    It's worth noting that a lot of young women begin to question this role during high school and rebel against it in certain ways (which can double as a rebellion against parents. think fuzzy legs and sassiness.)
    What's interesting is that many of these rebellious teenage ladies learn, by the end of college, that in order to survive in the "real world" (of business, etc.), they'll need to become more socially acceptable. I'm not just talking about these new-found young professionals taming their riot grrl appearance in order to get a "real job", I've also noted a return to the pleasant, polite, (ehem- manipulative), demeanor that is expected of a woman (by an- ehem- male boss.)
    What's scary is that I find myself doing this...
    And speaking of riot grrls, look at Kathleen Hanna-- the pioneer of this genre is now married (to a Beastie Boy! Guess that fulfills the point on your list about needing a guy to complete you...). And she's on a major label--so I guess that formula works. What's happening?!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was really touched by how he wanted to be there for his brother during his time of need but in his life experiences and acquired skills he had forgotten to pick up some of those "effeminate" qualities like sensitivity, nurturing and comforting. It is true that sometimes we are so wrapped up in what we are suppose to act like in as respective boys and girls that we are not getting the full well- roundedness of abilities that we should get. I think now girls have it easier though if you think about it, girls can wear pants but its still not acceptable for boys to wear dresses and don't you think they would like wearing a dress, it can be very comfortable!

    ReplyDelete
  3. tina, thanks so much for your comments! what you said really resonates with me (in the sense that i think it’s true, not in the sense where i’m like “wow i love how things are this way!”)

    all of this is so interesting to me that i almost don’t even know where to start.

    the teenage ladies’ rebellion, like many efforts of frustrated individuals in an overly-structured world, is a necessary and wonderful thing. it’s about finding a group of people that is as terrified as you are by what society represents – and it is a very comforting thing. at the same time, parts of my own experience have led me to believe that in so many cases, counter-culture develops its own closed-minded restrictions and pigeonholes. for instance, can i [not like me, me – but the hypothetical for instance me] be part of counter-culture and still be religious? can i choose to wear make-up? can i be republican? can i like beyoncĂ©? [ok, that last one actually does apply to me, man do i love beyoncĂ©.]

    and yes, i do believe a certain attitude is expected, to this day, of women in the workplace. in many instances, it becomes a choice: you either compromise your values, or you lose job security.

    or even worse, someone else’s job security. before i came to grad school here, i worked as a job coach for people with disabilities. i helped my clients find, learn, and keep paid employment. i loved working with my clients! unfortunately, the job itself was often frustrating – for reasons unrelated to my clients. one situation that still upsets me: i worked with shawn, a 35 year old man who was loving, gentle, and had cerebral palsy. he worked in a factory in pittsburgh, emptying trash cans and recycling cardboard. shawn had worked this job for 10 years, and did a great job, but sometimes he would forget certain trash cans or not understand changes in routine. so, once a month i would come do his job with him, take notes, and help him make changes. i loved working with shawn. we would talk about his dog, otis, or how much he loved the pittsburgh steelers or going fishing with his dad. but i hated being at the factory with him. the factory workers, after the first few visits, incessantly called out as we worked: “oh shawn, is your GIRLFRIEND here again today?” “i wish i got to have a pretty girl follow me around when i worked” “hey, honey, come follow ME around instead – i’ll show you a better time.” it was a horrible feeling. i don’t stand for crap like that. i’m not intimidated to tell someone exactly why they’re being a demeaning asshole. but i was responsible for shawn, who needed this job, and who could easily have been replaced by the management – for little or even no reason. i know i made the right choice, by not punching those guys out, because i was protecting shawn, who needed my help. but the compromise still hurts and bothers me.

    thanks for your comments. i look forward to more conversation!

    love,caro

    ReplyDelete
  4. carly, thanks for your thoughts! i think that is an excellent point – we do get wrapped up in how we are “supposed” to act, and the real answer is that we all probably need to be more well-rounded! in fact, that was pretty much mr. ehrmann’s conclusion. that the answers to the crises of masculinity and femininity were the same: the truths of humanity: simply that we ought to live by love, and to leave the world a better place than we found it.

    love,caro

    ReplyDelete
  5. You know, Caro, your description of that situation with shawn really makes me feel sad. For him, for you and even for the men who have chosen to buy into those signifiers of masculinity that turn them into assholes. When I think about Shawn's situation I imagine that those men probably continue to ridicule him in many ways without recognizing how cruel that is; they may even have created justifications to tell themselves that they're making Shawn "part of the gang" or something bizarre like that. They may be so far removed from compassionate relating toward others that they don't know how to relate to another individual who is differently abled, gendered, skinned, haired, politiced, etc that all they can do is relate through sarcasm and ridicule. I do feel compassion for them but I also feel really really mad at them - for being bullies and making the choice to be bullies.

    ReplyDelete